Sahara Desert's Age Doubles in Climate Simulation

A shrinking sea off northern Africa, the Mediterranean's predecessor, triggered the desert's formation 7 million years ago, a study suggests

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The desertification of northern Africa may have started 7 million years ago, or more than twice as long ago as earlier estimates of the Sahara's age, climate simulations suggest. The findings also hint that this shift in climate would have been triggered by the gradual shrinking of the Tethys Sea, the predecessor of today’s Mediterranean.

The sands of the Sahara may seem timeless, but most geological data suggests that the world's largest non-polar desert formed between 2 million and 3 million years ago, about the same time as cycles of ice ages began plaguing the Northern Hemisphere.

Still, scientists have unearthed tantalizing clues that the Sahara may be much older than 3 million years old, says Zhongshi Zhang, a palaeoclimatologist at the Bjerknes Center for Climate Research in Bergen, Norway and a a co-author of the latest study, published on September 17 in Nature. Almost a decade ago, he notes, one team reported evidence of widespread dune deposits estimated to be 7 million years old in northern Chad.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Other analyses, including of long-term variations in the amounts of dust and pollen in sediments drilled from seafloors off northern Africa, chronicle extended dry spells in the region starting about 8 million years ago.

But it has been unclear what might have triggered the aridification, says Zhang. There were no major episodes of mountain formation that might have influenced climate in the region, he notes. Nor do his team's climate simulations suggest that long-term changes in Earth’s orbit or atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide are to blame.

Instead, the analyses hint that a gradual rearrangement of land masses — and in particular, the shrinking of the ancient Tethys Sea as the African tectonic plate moved north relative to the Eurasian plate — prompted a shift in weather patterns.

The simulations showed that the shrinking of the Tethys Sea — along with the uplift of the Arabian peninsula, which replaced a broad swath of ocean off northeastern Africa between 7 million and 11 million years ago — weakened the African summer monsoon. When those westerly winds waned, the flow of moisture from the tropical Atlantic that previously swept across northern Africa shifted south. Before the rise of the Arabian peninsula, northern Africa had a moister, semi-arid climate, the researchers note.

Stefan Kröpelin, a geologist at the University of Cologne in Germany, says that the model is interesting but that it is mostly “numerical speculation based on almost non-existent geological evidence”. In particular, he adds, little is known about the size and geology of the Tethys Sea. “Nothing you can find in the Sahara is older than 500,000 years, and in terms of Saharan climate even our knowledge of the past 10,000 is full of gaps,” he says.

Northern Africa probably saw a succession of alternating drier and wetter phases in the distant geological past, says Kröpelin. But all available evidence suggests that the Sahara as we know it did not exist before the glaciation of the Northern Hemisphere began, around 3 million years ago, he says.

Mathieu Schuster, a sedimentologist at the University of Strasbourg in France and a co-author of the latest work, disagrees. Although it is true that too little is known about the ancient geology of the region, he says, the 2006 Chad study (which Schuster also co-authored) as well as the ones that reported increases in dust an pollen from sediment, contained “strong pieces of evidence to support our new findings”.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on September 17, 2014.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe