New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Satellite Data Reveal a Plumper Planet Earth

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The earth is more like a pumpkin than a perfect sphere: it's a bit wider around the middle. Scientists have been tracking the earth's girth for more than two decades. For most of this time, the planet was becoming more spherical because the melting of the polar ice caps at the end of the last glaciation allowed the earth's mantle to relax slightly in a process known as postglacial rebound. Now researchers writing in the current issue of the journal Science say this trend has reversed.

Using data from 10 satellites, Christopher M. Cox of Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services (ITSS) and Benjamin F. Cho of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center determined that the gravitational forces near the equator have grown since 1998. This implies that the circumference of the planet has increased as a result of a shift of mass from high altitudes to lower ones. "The three areas that can trigger large changes in the earth's gravitational field are oceans, polar and glacial ice and atmosphere," Cox explains. The researchers say they have ruled out atmospheric causes, but beyond that, the reason for the shift is unclear. Because a concomitant rise in sea level hasn't been detected, it is unlikely that the transfer of earth-bound ice to the oceans is driving the change. A redistribution of mass within the oceans, however, could be the culprit. Further measurements of sea level height, water temperature and salinity should help scientists unravel the mystery of the bulge.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe