New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Satellite Data Reveal Drought in Amazon Rain Forest

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Tracking subtle environmental changes in the Amazon Basin, home to the largest contiguous area of tropical forest in the world, is extremely difficult. Making matters more challenging are the area's large seasonal fluctuations in precipitation that affect climate and land use. A report published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences outlines a new method of quantifying the effects of drought over the vast forest--from space.

"The Amazon is simply too big and complex to study on the ground alone," study author Gregory P. Asner of the Carnegie Institution in Stanford, Calif., says. "Thus far it¿s been impossible to determine some of the most basic properties of the forest that we need in order to understand what happens during common climatic events--such as the El Ni¿o dry periods--and what that means to forest growth and the amount of carbon that is locked up in the forest via photosynthesis." Conventional remote-sensing approaches are not well suited to studying drought in tropical forests because the effects may be too subtle to detect or the biophysical mechanisms of the plants are not well understood, the researchers note. In the new work, Asner and his colleagues investigated a novel way of tracking conditions on the ground from space using NASA¿s Earth Observing-1 (EO-1) satellite. The technique, known as imaging spectroscopy, measures the amount of sunlight that is reflected off the earth. The amount of scattering occurring in the near-infrared region is then related to the water content of the forest canopy.

To test the satellite measurements against ground-based ones, the scientists set up a 10,000-square-meter site inside a forest that was experiencing drought. Essentially, they covered a large swath of the rain forest in plastic, depriving it of precipitation, and monitored soil moisture and other characteristics over time. According to the report, the satellite data are highly sensitive to drought conditions and the observations allowed the team to estimate the forest¿s carbon content and productivity with greater accuracy than current models do. Comments Asner, "The fact that we confirmed that satellite imaging can be used to measure something as detailed as the physiology of the rain forest canopy means that this technique might be useful for understanding other types of ecological phenomena at both large and small scales."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe