New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Satellite's-Eye View of an Africa Despoiled [Slide Show]

Satellite images from the last 35 years reveal sweeping environmental changes throughout Africa

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


View the slide show

The natural wealth of Africa has been plundered over the past 35 years, as illustrated by a new atlas of satellite imagery from the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). Roads now lace the untamed tracts of the rainforest in Congo—second only to the Amazon in size—bringing bushmeat hunting and logging wherever they lead. In fact, the continent now loses 9.9 million acres (four million hectares) of forest a year, nearly one fourth of the world's total deforestation.

Vast mines for copper, phosphate, gold and diamonds dig into the landscape throughout the continent, and the quest for oil eats up land in Chad, Nigeria and Equatorial Guinea. Farming has taken a toll as well: 65 percent of the continent's farmlands suffer some form of damage, including erosion, which contributes to the loss of 50 metric tons of soil per hectare per year.

But it's not just the exploitation of natural resources driving environmental changes: Cities like Addis Ababa, Cairo and Dakar sprawl into the surrounding countryside—a reflection of the growing shift from rural to urban living that has exploded the latter from a city of a few hundred thousand to a major metropolitan area of 2.5 million people.

And climate change—a global disaster for which Africa bears little blame—shrinks glaciers and lakes, changes rainfall patterns and wreaks havoc on subsistence farmers. More than 300 million people in Africa already do not have access to enough water, a number that is expected to grow as the globe continues to warm.

The following images are just a few of the thousands sent back to Earth from the U.S. Landsat satellites since they were launched starting in 1972 as well as those from more recently lofted orbital cameras. UNEP's "Africa: Atlas of Our Changing Environment" contains more than 300 such satellite pictures detailing human-induced changes in all 53 African countries, including those for the better such as holding back the encroaching desert with a green belt of trees in Niger.

But it is images like the shrinking of Lake Chad, which is only 5 percent of its 1973 size, and the melting glacier atop Kilimanjaro that are seemingly the most enduring legacy of change.

View the slide show

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe