New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Satellites Show CFC Ban Slowed Ozone Destruction

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It seems there's finally some good news for the ozone layer. According to a report that will appear in an upcoming issue of the Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres, the rate at which ozone is disappearing in the upper stratosphere is slowing. The findings highlight the success of a worldwide reduction in harmful chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs).

The 1995 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded for the discovery that chlorine released into the atmosphere by CFCs, used mainly as refrigerants and aerosol propellants, destroyed the planet's protective ozone layer. An international ban on the chemicals followed. Michael Newchurch of the University of Alabama in Huntsville and his colleagues examined data from three NASA satellites and ground stations located around the world to study the state of the ozone layer. "We're not gaining ozone but we're losing it less quickly," Newchurch reports. "And the amount of chlorine in that layer of the stratosphere has not yet peaked, but it has slowed down significantly, so we should start to see some ozone improvement in the coming years."

The findings do not put the ozone layer in the clear, however. For one, improvements were seen only in the upper stratosphere. "We don't see compelling evidence that the destruction of ozone is slowing the lower stratosphere, where 80 percent of the protective ozone layer exists," Newchurch says. That's because factors in addition to chlorine, such as greenhouse gases and changing wind currents, alter the ozone layer at lower altitudes. But Newchurch notes that the results are a promising beginning for an ozone layer recovery.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe