Satellites Show CFC Ban Slowed Ozone Destruction

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It seems there's finally some good news for the ozone layer. According to a report that will appear in an upcoming issue of the Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres, the rate at which ozone is disappearing in the upper stratosphere is slowing. The findings highlight the success of a worldwide reduction in harmful chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs).

The 1995 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded for the discovery that chlorine released into the atmosphere by CFCs, used mainly as refrigerants and aerosol propellants, destroyed the planet's protective ozone layer. An international ban on the chemicals followed. Michael Newchurch of the University of Alabama in Huntsville and his colleagues examined data from three NASA satellites and ground stations located around the world to study the state of the ozone layer. "We're not gaining ozone but we're losing it less quickly," Newchurch reports. "And the amount of chlorine in that layer of the stratosphere has not yet peaked, but it has slowed down significantly, so we should start to see some ozone improvement in the coming years."

The findings do not put the ozone layer in the clear, however. For one, improvements were seen only in the upper stratosphere. "We don't see compelling evidence that the destruction of ozone is slowing the lower stratosphere, where 80 percent of the protective ozone layer exists," Newchurch says. That's because factors in addition to chlorine, such as greenhouse gases and changing wind currents, alter the ozone layer at lower altitudes. But Newchurch notes that the results are a promising beginning for an ozone layer recovery.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe