New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Satellites Track Near-Earth Asteroid Explosions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The recent Leonid meteor shower gave skygazers a chance to observe pieces of space debris meeting their demise as they collided with the earth's atmosphere at high speeds. Most of the streaks on display during the Leonid shower are just specks of cometary dust and hence pose little risk to observers on the ground. But explosions of much larger asteroids high in the atmosphere can cause considerable damage to our planet. A study published in the current issue of the journal Nature calculates just how likely such collisions are. The good news? The findings suggest that 10-megaton explosions from objects about 50 meters wide will occur about one third as often as previously believed.

Peter Brown of the University of Western Ontario and his colleagues analyzed previously unreleased data collected continuously over the last eight and a half years by U.S. government satellites. While scanning the globe for evidence of nuclear explosions the satellites also detected nearly 300 optical flashes caused by planetary debris ranging from one to 10 meters across crashing into the earth's atmosphere. On average, the scientists report, our atmosphere is rocked by one explosion per year that is equivalent to five kilotons of TNT. The team's calculations show that larger bursts like the one that occurred in 1908 over Tunguska, Siberia, and flattened trees over hundreds of square kilometers, will occur once every 1,000 years. Although scientists are still a long way from cataloging all the interstellar objects tens of meters across, Robert Jedicke of the University of Arizona notes in an accompanying editorial that "we can all worry a little less about the risk of the next hazardous impact."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe