On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
During the SARS outbreak in China, a handful of “super spreaders” may have transmitted the airborne disease much better than others. Supporting this idea, a group led by Harvard University researchers measured the number of microscopic fluid droplets exhaled from 11 healthy subjects and found that just six of them breathed out 98 percent of the droplets. The researchers then had the subjects inhale nebulized saline for a few minutes. The saline treatment cut the number of droplets by 66 to 80 percent for up to six hours, probably by increasing the surface tension of the mucosal linings of the lungs and thereby preventing smaller (and more easily exhaled) droplets from forming. A saline spray could reduce the spread of airborne diseases, including SARS, tuberculosis and influenza, the investigators suggest in the December 14, 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
