Regulating Evolution: Scanning for Switches

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Editor's Note: This story is part of the Feature "Regulating Evolution: How Gene Switches Make Life" from the May 2008 Issue of Scientific American.

One of the main limits on the pace of discovery of human enhancers has been the difficulty of identifying where they reside in the human genome’s vast noncoding regions. Biologists are now using the preservative power of natural selection to sniff out stretches of noncoding DNA that have been unusually well conserved over long stretches of evolutionary time in the hope of detecting enhancers.

In this article we have been emphasizing changes in enhancers that account for differences among organisms. But it should be easy to appreciate that some enhancers carry out functions that have not changed. While the steady pace of mutation erodes the overall similarity of DNA sequences among species as they diverge, natural selection will maintain the sequences of enhancers that maintain their function, sometimes to an extraordinary degree.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It is common knowledge that lawyers and sharks have a lot of similarities. But who would have guessed that extends to the level of DNA? Yet that is essentially what researchers at the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Singapore and the J. Craig Venter Institute in Rockville, Md., have demonstrated. The team found that despite more than 500 million years of evolution separating sharks and people, we share nearly 5,000 elements in noncoding regions near genes that appear to be enhancers. Remarkably, most of these highly preserved elements are located in the vicinity of body-building genes, reflecting the shared overall body architecture of vertebrates.

Every vertebrate has anatomical features—organs, tissues, cell types, and so forth—that have been preserved throughout their diversification. Over shorter evolutionary distances, the number of shared elements and degree of similarity increases.

The genome-comparison approach is thus rapidly expanding the catalogue of known human, mammalian and vertebrate enhancers and could lead to the identification of sequences involved in the divergence of body forms.

—S.B.C., B.P. and N.G.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe