SciAm 50: Connections to an Untethered Future

Delivering electric power through the air cuts the final cord

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Although laptops, cell phones and other gadgets give us remarkable mobility, we can roam untethered only for as long as our batteries hold out. Photonics researcher Marin Soljacic of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology wants to eliminate that shackle by delivering wireless electricity, or WiTricity.

Soljacic hung a copper coil 0.6 meter (two feet) in diameter from a ceiling, then hung another coil about 2.1 meters (seven feet) away, with a 60-watt lightbulb dangling from it. When he plugged the first coil into a power source, the lightbulb on the second coil lit up. Electric current in the first coil established a magnetic field that induced current in the second one.

Many motors exploit this effect, but normally induction works only across gaps of a few millimeters, dying off rapidly with greater distance. Soljacic tuned his coils to resonate, allowing efficient energy exchange over a distance. Future implementations of his system might enable laptops and cell phones to recharge when they are in a room equipped with a resonance emitter.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The human impulse to cut the cord runs deep. Apple released the iPhone as an ultimate wireless interface, and people lined up to pay $600 for it. The handheld device combines all the functions of an advanced mobile phone with those of the latest iPod, thereby allowing users to wander freely while making phone calls, accessing the Web, sending text messages and e-mail, taking photographs, listening to music and watching videos. Although some earlier phones had offered many of these functions, the iPhone’s full-size “multi-touch” screen gave customers far more flexibility, including use of a standard keyboard for messaging, streaming of YouTube video and a visual list of voice mails—not to mention access to iTunes, by far the dominant online music source.

Wireless sensors also gained flexibility. Reduced to the size of rice grains or dust, they can mount a vigil for chemical and biological weapons or check for moisture content in the soil. Already they are changing how people monitor the world. A major barrier, however, has been how to know if such networks of randomly distributed sensors leave gaps in coverage or if the sensors’ ranges overlap, thus wasting the precious bits of power they may carry.

Robert Ghrist, a mathematician at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and mathematics professor Vin de Silva of Pomona College harnessed the science of mathematical homology to answer both questions. Homology analyzes the points, lines and geometric arrangements within shapes. By treating sensors as points, pairs of sensors as edges, and collections of edges as shapes, Ghrist and de Silva devised algorithms that can tell whether a sprinkled network of sensors overlap or leave gaps.

The advantage of Ghrist’s and de Silva’s algorithms is that they only need to know which sensors are within range of one another, not where each sensor actually is; they eliminate the need for expensive global-positioning circuits or the manual mapping of circuits. Knowing the locations of gaps and overlaps, network operators could turn up the power of certain sensors or strategically add new ones to fill in blank spots. 
—Mark Fischetti

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe