Science Businesses Worry About British Decision to Leave EU

Greater taxes and trade barriers concern chemical companies

Nigel Farage, leader of UKIP and the Vote Leave campaign.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Organisations representing chemical-using industries across the UK and Europe are united in expressing their disappointment at the result of the referendum, along with their determination to work with companies and governments to negotiate the best possible terms under the situation.

‘While business craves certainty, it is also used to operating in challenging and changing circumstances,’ said Steve Elliott, chief executive of the UK Chemical Industries Association. ‘I am confident that an important and resilient industry such as ours can prosper in this new situation.’

Steve Bates, head of the UK BioIndustry Association, said that the vote raises ‘key questions about regulation of medicines’, intellectual property, recruitment of talented personnel and the single market.  ‘This will require detailed and dispassionate thinking … as we work through these complex issues,’ he added.  The future of the European Medicines Agency based in London is also in question.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic) highlighted the importance of the UK chemical industry’s trade with Europe, with over €20 billion each of imports and exports exchanged between the UK and the rest of the bloc. ‘Given this importance, we need to work closely to ensure that existing trade and investment is not weakened and future opportunities are seized,’ the organisation stated. Mike Thompson, head of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, added that the UK must ‘send a strong signal that the UK is open for business’.

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on June 24, 2016.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe