Science Notes - March 4, 1905

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MM. Chanoz and Perrigot have been attempting to repeat an experiment made by M. Bordier, who showed that N-rays emitted by tempered steel could apparently be detected by photography. The former, however, found that equal sized pieces of steel and of lead, placed on exactly similar screens, and exposed for various periods, never gave different halos, as described by M. Bordier. In June, 1903, the English Astronomer Royal pub lished the statement that there was a discrepancy in the determination of the longitude between the Green wich and Paris observatories. It was also stated that independent, though simultaneous, observations to recti fy this error were to be undertaken by two observers in France. This work has now been completed, and at a recent meeting of the Paris Academy of Sci ences, M. Loewy, director of the National Observatory, exhibited the results of the French observers. This is in remarkable accord with the results of the Eng lish observers. The difference only amounts to three hundredths of a second, being in actual figures 9 min utes 20.974 seconds. From this it is deduced that Paris stands on a meridian which is east of the merid ian of Greenwich, and that its noon is this amount in advance of that of Greenwich. The results of these observations, and their close, agreement with the previ ous work carried out for this purpose in 1888 and 1892, testify to the commendable exactitude of the operations of both the English and French astronomers. Accord ing to M. Loewy, the results of this last investigation establish precisely and definitely the difference of longi tude between the two fundamental meridians of the respective observatories.

SA Supplements Vol 59 Issue 1522suppThis article was published with the title “Science Notes” in SA Supplements Vol. 59 No. 1522supp (), p. 179
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican03041905-24395bsupp

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe