Scientific American MIND Reviews The Brain Electric

Malcolm Gay’s book explores “The Dramatic High-Tech Race to Merge Minds and Machines"

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Brain Electric: The Dramatic High-Tech Race to Merge Minds and Machines
by Malcolm Gay
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2015 ($26)

In one of the most memorable scenes from the early Star Trek movies, Dr. Leonard McCoy confronts a 20th-century surgeon, who is about to drill holes in Enterprise navigator Pavel Chekov's head, and gives him a dressing-down, roaring about the era's primitive “butcher knives.” McCoy soon repairs Chekov's badly damaged brain with a high-tech gizmo from the future that looks like an Xbox and doesn't even break the skin.

Hold that image in mind—of the extreme contrast between the primitive present and the supposedly wondrous future—and you will begin to understand why journalist Gay's The Brain Electric is, all at once, one of the most fascinating and exasperating books you will ever read. Why? Because it is about the almost unspeakably primitive drills and butcher knives that some of today's leading scientists are using to try to bring about the extraordinary future we so often picture in science-fiction movies.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To get to a future in which someday, maybe, people will communicate with computers, the Internet and even one another using their thoughts alone—no more keyboards, mice, telephones or shouting at your kids down the block—you need to start somewhere, right? Gay takes us into the gritty labs of the surgeons who have been doing the hard work for the past 15 years: Andrew Schwartz of the University of Pittsburgh, Miguel Nicolelis of Duke University and others. They all are in cutthroat competition for the next big DARPA grant and, of course, for the brass ring—the Nobel Prize that is almost certain to be awarded to the best of the lot.

And talk about grit. Gay takes us step by gruesome step through procedure after procedure in which cocksure docs breach skulls and implant arrays of electrodes into the brains of rats, monkeys, and paralyzed and epileptic humans in brazen attempts to get neurons communicating meaningfully with computers. Occasionally there is a breakthrough: a paraplegic woman thinks a robot arm to feed herself; a monkey whose arms and hands are restrained plays a video game; the brains of two rats are linked in a way that gets the actions of one to affect the actions of the other.

So amazing, so promising—and so frustratingly primitive. The brain has 100 billion neurons, but even the most sophisticated implants can monitor only a few hundred. Within weeks or months the immune system invariably attacks the implanted electrodes, rendering many of them useless, and the brain changes so rapidly that connections often have to be recalibrated daily to keep them working properly. There are no cures, no miracles—only suggestive demonstrations, foretelling—who knows, really?

The book ends with a sobering reminder of just how rudimentary present-day brain science is. Gay quotes Schwartz: “We have no idea what makes a neuron fire…, and that's at the root of everything.” But you have to start somewhere, right?

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN AND FARRAR, STRAUS AND GIROUX ARE AFFILIATES

Robert Epstein, senior research psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology in Vista, Calif., is a contributing editor for Scientific American Mind and former editor in chief of Psychology Today. His latest book is Teen 2.0: Saving Our Children and Families from the Torment of Adolescence (Linden Publishing, 2010).

More by Robert Epstein
SA Mind Vol 26 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Book Review: The Brain Electric” in SA Mind Vol. 26 No. 6 (), p. 70
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1115-70b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe