Scientific Men Misrepresented

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“There was a scientific man who published a book to demonstrate that steam power could never drive a vessel across the Atlantic Ocean, and just as the book got out of the press, a steamer came steaming along at the rate of three hundred miles per day, and others have been at it at the same rate ever since, and the scientific book has gone to the oblivious stream."—[Extract of Col. Ben-ton's letter to C. Street, on the Pacific rail- road, published in the IL National Intelligencer" " It is ass&rted that Dr. Dionysius Lardner, whose fame has extended over the civilized world, demonstrated to a nicety the impossibility of crossing the ocean in a steamer.— His redoubtable arguments and his inevitable conclusions did not, however, prevent the appearance of the English steamer ' Syrius ' at the docks of New York. Practical men with a thousandth part of Dr. Lardner's scientific acquirements were satisfied—the Dr. to the contrary notwithstanding—that there existed no insurmountable impediment; and the consequences we see in the splendid ' lines ' that now cross the ocean with the regularity of ferry-boats."—[Journal of Agriculture, (Boston) for August. [If Col. Benton and the editor of the " Journal of Agriculture" had been careful readers of the " Scientific American," they would not have made the above mistakes, for the Colonel doubtless refers to Dr. Lardner.— He never published a book to demonstrate the impracticability of a steamer crossing the Atlantic Ocean, nor did he ever make an assertion to that effect, it has been attributed to him, and has floated along down time, and through a thousand careless newspapers, but it is not true. On such subjects we regret to say, that we often find many of our leading men very defective in historical knowledge ; they speak ind write in such a manner as would lead us to conclude that they derived the most of their information from unreliable papers. Dr. Lardner distinctly affirmed the very contrary of what has been attributed to him in the two foregoing paragraphs, as any person can find out for himself by consulting pages 295, 6 and 7, of Lardner's work on the "Steam Engine, Navigation, and Railways.”

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 50This article was published with the title “Scientific Men Misrepresented” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 50 (), p. 397
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08271853-397d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe