Scientists Add New Member to Vitamin B Family

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A new page may need to be added to the vitamin B family album. According to a report published today in the journal Nature, researchers have determined that the compound known as pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) should be classified as a vitamin in the same class as vitamins B2 and B3.

Scientists first isolated PQQ from bacteria in 1979. The compound was also thought to be important to mammals, but its precise biochemical pathways remained unclear. In the new work, Takaoki Kasahara and Tadafumi Kato of the Institute of Physical and Chemical Research in Japan elucidate PQQ's role in degrading the amino acid lysine in mice. They found that PQQ generates an enzyme that is required for the reaction to occur. Animals that were deprived of PQQ grew more slowly than their well-fed counterparts did and had fragile skin and compromised immune systems, the researchers found. In addition, the PQQ-lacking mice did not reproduce as well as normal mice did. The authors conclude that PQQ "therefore qualifies as a newcomer to the B group of vitamins." The human body cannot produce most vitamins, but plenty of PQQ can be found in a balanced diet that includes vegetables or meat.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe