Scientists Boost Antioxidant Content of Corn

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Vitamin E is associated with a number of beneficial effects, including reduced cholesterol, a decreased risk of coronary disease and improved prenatal heath, but nearly 25 percent of people in the U.S. do not receive the recommended dose. Now scientists have developed a new method of engineering plants, including corn, containing significantly increased levels of the antioxidant.

The term Vitamin E can apply to eight naturally occurring forms of compounds known as tocotrienols and tocopherols. The synthesis of the former in plants is well studied. In the new work, Edgar B. Cahoon of the USDA-ARS Plant Genetics Research Unit and his colleagues investigated the pathway that leads to tocopherols. The researchers isolated genes that encode enzymes known as homogentisic acid geranylgeranyl transferases (HGGT). Plants engineered to overexpress HGGT contained 10 to 15 times the total Vitamin E content as normal plants did. In corn seeds, the increase was sixfold. The authors write in the September issue of the journal Nature Biotechnology that their results "demonstrate the ability to enhance the antioxidant content of crops by introduction of an enzyme that redirects metabolic flux."

Further work is required to maximize the dietary benefits of Vitamin E-rich plants produced using this method, the authors note. But if the process can be refined, there could be additional advantages. For one, the plants will most likely be more resistant to oxidative stresses, leading to seeds that can be stored longer and improved crop productivity. In addition, vegetable oils manufactured from the seeds would have an extended shelf life.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe