New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Scientists Connect Indian Castes and European Heritage

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


About 5,000 years ago, people from west Eurasia are thought to have first entered India. Once there, they presumably mixed with the native proto-Asian population living on the subcontinent. But historians credit these same Indo-Europeans with creating the current Hindu castes, and it seems that in doing so, they placed themselves at the top of this class system, perhaps one they superimposed on an existing social order. Because marriages between members of different castes have traditionally been taboo in India, the newcomers would have very likely intermarried only with native Indians of higher standing.

To test this theory, an international team of researchers from India, Europe and the U.S. compared maternally inherited DNA variations¿as well as paternally and bi-parentally inherited variations¿of 265 Indian men from eight different castes with those of 750 African, European, Asian and other Indian men. Their findings, published in this month's issue of Genome Research, were two-fold¿and largely confirmed the idea that members of higher castes are more closely related to Europeans.

The researchers discovered that the maternally inherited DNA more closely resembled that of Asians, although genetic similarities to Europeans were more common in members of the higher ranks. Among the paternally inherited DNA, however, they found an even greater likeness to European DNA. Thus, the scientists suggest that the western Eurasians who arrived in India were mostly men who placed themselves at the top of the social ladder and married only women in the highest castes.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe