Scientists Connect Indian Castes and European Heritage

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


About 5,000 years ago, people from west Eurasia are thought to have first entered India. Once there, they presumably mixed with the native proto-Asian population living on the subcontinent. But historians credit these same Indo-Europeans with creating the current Hindu castes, and it seems that in doing so, they placed themselves at the top of this class system, perhaps one they superimposed on an existing social order. Because marriages between members of different castes have traditionally been taboo in India, the newcomers would have very likely intermarried only with native Indians of higher standing.

To test this theory, an international team of researchers from India, Europe and the U.S. compared maternally inherited DNA variations¿as well as paternally and bi-parentally inherited variations¿of 265 Indian men from eight different castes with those of 750 African, European, Asian and other Indian men. Their findings, published in this month's issue of Genome Research, were two-fold¿and largely confirmed the idea that members of higher castes are more closely related to Europeans.

The researchers discovered that the maternally inherited DNA more closely resembled that of Asians, although genetic similarities to Europeans were more common in members of the higher ranks. Among the paternally inherited DNA, however, they found an even greater likeness to European DNA. Thus, the scientists suggest that the western Eurasians who arrived in India were mostly men who placed themselves at the top of the social ladder and married only women in the highest castes.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe