Scientists Create Double Quantum Dot for Computing

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Purdue University physicist Albert Chang and colleagues have successfully linked two so-called quantum dots such that the tiny structures could conceivably serve as qubits¿switches for quantum computers that can be on, off or in a combination of states. So that the pairs of would-be qubits could exchange information, the scientists connected quantum dots, essentially flat pools of electrons measuring a mere 180-nanometers wide, using even finer nanowires made by way of standard electron beam lithography. But they had to do so in such a way that they could still determine which state each individual dot was in, depending on its electron spin. "Each dot can have a one [on] or a zero [off] because the spin can be up or down," Chang explains. But "without being able to isolate each spin, you cannot do quantum computation."

The trick, the team reports today in Science, lay in controlling how many electrons ended up in each quantum dot. As in atoms, the electrons fill the dot by taking up positions in successive orbitals around the center. Chang and colleagues took advantage of the fact that when there was only one electron in the dot's outermost orbital, they could analyze the flow of electricity through the dots and thereby detect spin. "Now we have proven that you can link quantum dots together," Chang says, "but the next thing will be to make them do things, to control the spins in a double-quantum dot."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American