Scientists Create Double Quantum Dot for Computing

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Purdue University physicist Albert Chang and colleagues have successfully linked two so-called quantum dots such that the tiny structures could conceivably serve as qubits¿switches for quantum computers that can be on, off or in a combination of states. So that the pairs of would-be qubits could exchange information, the scientists connected quantum dots, essentially flat pools of electrons measuring a mere 180-nanometers wide, using even finer nanowires made by way of standard electron beam lithography. But they had to do so in such a way that they could still determine which state each individual dot was in, depending on its electron spin. "Each dot can have a one [on] or a zero [off] because the spin can be up or down," Chang explains. But "without being able to isolate each spin, you cannot do quantum computation."

The trick, the team reports today in Science, lay in controlling how many electrons ended up in each quantum dot. As in atoms, the electrons fill the dot by taking up positions in successive orbitals around the center. Chang and colleagues took advantage of the fact that when there was only one electron in the dot's outermost orbital, they could analyze the flow of electricity through the dots and thereby detect spin. "Now we have proven that you can link quantum dots together," Chang says, "but the next thing will be to make them do things, to control the spins in a double-quantum dot."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American