Scientists Create 'Dry' Water Droplets

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When does spilling water not make something wet? This question may sound like the beginning of a riddle, but scientists at the College of France in Paris have actually found a way to move a liquid across a surface while keeping it dry. Their results appear in today's issue of the journal Nature.

Pascale Aussillous and David Quere coated small amounts of fluid with a hydrophobic, or "water fearing," powder to make "liquid marbles" that can roll over surfaces without leaving a trace. A thin layer of the powder settles between the liquid and the surrounding air and allows the coated water to retain a spherical shape. The drops can then remain on a variety of surfaces¿including a pool of water¿without "spilling."

The scientists say their liquid marbles behave more like soft solids than liquids. When regular water droplets interact with a solid surface, such as a pane of glass, they form a lens shape and tend to move by sliding¿in which case some liquid gets left behind, wetting the surface. But when the liquid marbles come in contact with a solid surface, their spherical shape results in less interaction and, instead of sliding, they roll.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Moving the liquid marbles is easy, the researchers say, and can be done using small gravitational, electrical or magnetic fields. They hope the liquid marbles will find uses in technological applications that need small amounts of liquid moved quickly across a solid surface. But before such applications can emerge, L. Mahadevan of the University of Cambridge writes in an accompanying article, researchers need to investigate how sturdy the drops are and how they will behave with age.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe