Scientists Devise the World's Most Accurate Clock

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Thanks to the first ever all-optical atomic clock, physicists can now divide time down to the femtosecond. In today's issue of Science, Scott A. Diddams and colleagues at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder, CO, the Max-Planck-Institut f¿r Quantenoptik in Garching, Germany and at the University of Colorado-Boulder, describe the instrument, which they say will "provide an even finer-grained view of the physical world" and help researcers "observe physical 'constants' evolve in time."

Since 1967, scientists have defined a single second according to microwave-frequency transitions in cesium, "ticks" that occur roughly once each nanosecond. Optical transitions in atoms take place more frequently and can thus meter out smaller divisions of time. But until recently, researchers had no way to tally the faster ticks. Now using a femtosecond laser, Diddams's team succeeded in counting optical transitions in a single, cooled mercury ion. These flips take place about 1.064 quadrillion times a second, or once per femtosecond. Not only is the new timepiece more precise, it's smaller too: in all, it occupies a compact space measuring 120 centimeters by 60 centimeters (see image).

Image: courtesy of SCOTT DIDDAMS

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American