Scientists Discover Additional Amino Acid

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A tiny methane-producing microbe has revealed the existence of a new amino acid, researchers report. Two studies published in the current issue of the journal Science describe pyrrolysine, a nonstandard amino acid encoded in the RNA of bacteria-like members of the group Archaea. The findings suggest that the genetic code may be more adaptable than previously believed.

When scientists first began to unravel the genetic code more than four decades ago, they determined that the four DNA bases formed 64 unique groups of three called codons. Further investigation revealed that 20 of these triplets identified amino acids, the building blocks of proteins, and the remainder contained instructions for when to start and stop protein production. Scientists identified selenocysteine, the 21st amino acid, in 1986. In the new work, Joseph A. Krzycki and his colleagues at Ohio State University were investigating a so-called amber codon in Methanosarcina barkeri, organisms that produce natural gas. The researchers found that the codon, which should have signaled a halt to protein production, instead acted as the blueprint for a previously unknown amino acid, pyrrolysine. The researchers also uncovered the specialized transfer-RNA necessary to insert pyrrolysine into proteins. In the second Science paper, biochemist Michael Chan of Ohio State and his colleagues detail the structure of the 22nd amino acid.

Considering how long it took scientists to identify it, pyrrolysine is most likely a very rare amino acid, according to Krzycki. But Chan is optimistic that more such discoveries lie ahead. "With so many researchers dissecting so many genomes now," he says, "it's reasonable to suggest that there might be more waiting to be found."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe