Scientists Discover a Bug with Giant Genital Pincers

Two remarkable insects—one with giant genital forceps—join a list of new finds

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers working in Brazil have discovered a new species of forcepfly with enormous genital pincers (right), bringing the total number of known species in this family to three. And in Costa Rica a new fairyfly has been found: at 250 microns long, it is invisible to the naked eye and one of the smallest insects in the world.

Entomologist Renato Machado of Texas A&M University and his colleagues described the new forcepfly, a pale, golden-colored insect, in February in the journal ZooKeys. The team named it Austromerope brasiliensis, after its home near the Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil. Almost nothing is known about the biology of the nocturnal and secretive forcepfly. Scientists are not really sure how it lives, what it eats, how it mates or what its larvae look like. Most researchers assume that the males use their extraordinarily large terminal forceps to grip the females during copulation or to fight male rivals.

John Huber of Natural Resources Canada and John S. Noyes of the Natural History Museum in London named the new species of fairyfly Tinkerbella nana, after the fairy and the dog from Peter Pan. Happily, nana happens to be derived from nanos, the Greek word for “dwarf.” Huber and Noyes described the species' light coloring, which includes yellows, browns and white, and spectacular wings, covered in delicate, long bristles called macrochaeta, in April in the Journal of Hymenoptera Research. The team suggests that this type of wing could help the fairyfly reduce drag and turbulence while in the air—fairyflies flap their tiny wings hundreds of times per second to keep aloft.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Though distinct in enough ways to earn itself a place in a new genus, T. nana is closely related to the world's smallest known winged insect, Kikiki huna, which is 158 microns long—about as small as a winged insect can be. Huber remarks, “If we have not already found them, we must surely be close to discovering the smallest insects and other arthropods.”

Adapted from Running Ponies at blogs.ScientificAmerican.com/running-ponies

About Becky Crew

Bec Crew is a Sydney-based science writer and award-winning blogger. She is the author of 'Zombie Tits, Astronaut Fish and Other Weird Animals' (NewSouth Press).

More by Becky Crew
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Don't Pince Me, Please” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 1 (), p. 24
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0713-24a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe