Scientists Discover Structure of Molecule That Metabolizes Most Drugs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists have discovered the structure of a molecule responsible for metabolizing more than half of all drugs, according to the results of a new study. The findings, published online by the journal Science, will help drug manufacturers to better understand how drugs are broken down and disposed of, and should aid in preventing dangerous cross-reactions between drugs.

This key molecule, dubbed PXR, controls a protein known as cytochrome P450-3A (abbreviated to CYP3A) that breaks down medications. It does this by binding to the compounds, thereby tagging them for degradation. But in contrast to most biological interactions, in which a molecule or receptor binds to a single chemical, University of North Carolina chemist Matthew R. Redinbo notes, PXR is "highly promiscuous," binding to compounds ranging from the anti-cancer drug Taxol to the abortion pill RU-486. If someone is taking more than one drug, this can lead to problems. "Imagine you are taking oral contraceptives and at the same time the herb St. John's wort," Redinbo says. "It's known that a constituent of St. John's wort, hyperforin, binds to PXR and turns on CYP3A4, which then breaks down lots of compounds in the liver, including contraceptives." Other negative interactions mediated by PXR, he adds, can lead to breakdown of the immunosuppressant cyclosporin and the anti-HIV drug Indinavir. The new work provides welcome insight into the mediating molecule. "Using the crystal structure of PXR," Redinbo remarks, "we may be able to predict these effects and prevent such drug-drug interactions."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe