Scientists Explain Mysterious Quake

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The devastating Assam earthquake of 1897 in northeastern India has puzzled researchers for more than a century. Now a team of scientists from the University of Colorado and the University of Oxford may have finally explained the event, which killed thousands of people and turned all masonry buildings in the region into rubble. Their findings appear in today's issue of Nature."Before this, nobody really knew what happened," says Roger Bilham of the University of Colorado.

Because the Indian and the Eurasian tectonic plates collide in northern India, pushing up the Himalayas, earthquakes there are not uncommon. But the 1897 temblor was unusually large. To unravel the mystery, the team compared data from a century-old survey of India with several new computer models of geological faults. One earlier theory proposed that a rupture on the Himalayan thrust fault, which then propagated south of Bhutan, caused the quake. But the new analysis suggests that the primary fault¿the 78-mile-long Oldham Fault¿was beneath the Shillong Plateau, some 100 miles south of Bhutan near Bangladesh.

"The Indian plate was being pushed up against the Himalayas, causing a portion of the land surface on the Shillong Plateau to pop up like a segment of a peeled orange would pop up under pressure," Bilham explains. "We calculated the slip of the fault to be about 15 meters, one of the largest slips ever calculated for any earthquake." The thrust was so strong, in fact, that boulders, tombstones and even people were tossed in the air, he notes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Fortunately an earthquake as powerful as the Assam event only occurs about once every 3,000 years on the Oldham Fault," Bilham says. "They are very rare but could be extremely devastating in this region, given the huge population of people now living in Bangladesh and the poor construction practices there."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe