Scientists Find Fourth Dimension in Plants

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One of the biggest mysteries about living things is why¿given their vast diversity¿they should all be built according to a simple rule known as quarter-power scaling. In short, this rule sees to it that many of an organism's traits¿from average life span to number of offspring¿vary according to the animal's mass (M) raised to some multiple of one-fourth. In both a mouse and a blue whale, for example, respiratory rate is proportional to M-1/4, and metabolic rate scales with M3/4. Because the scaling relates mass to the other three dimensions¿width, length and depth¿it is referred to as a fourth.

Scientists have studied this seemingly universal scaling law in animals for more than a century, but now they have discovered that it extends to plants as well. In this week's issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Karl J. Niklas of Cornell University and Brian J. Enquist of the University of Arizona report that growth rates, body lengths and pigment concentrations in a wide range of flora follow quarter-power scaling.

The group examined both unicellular and multicelllular plants, from marine algae to conifer trees, and found that annualized rates of growth scale as the 3/4-power of body mass, as does pigment concentration. So too, they discovered that a plant's body length scales as M 1/4. "[this] provides a potentially powerful tool for predicting many important properties for past as well as present day organisms and the communities in which they live," the authors write. "Our data say that growth rates are indifferent to other biological differences across species," Niklas adds. "In scaling, a tree is a tree is a tree."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe