Scientists Find the Smallest Black Hole Yet in a Nearby Galaxy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: Courtesy of ROBERT W. PROVIN and BRAD D. WALLIS

Astronomers at Rutgers University using the Hubble Space Telescope have spied something provocative¿they¿re just not sure yet exactly what it is. They suspect that M33, a galaxy they observed a mere three-million light years from our own Milky Way, may be the first ever seen to lack a supermassive black hole (SMBH) at its center. Or M33 houses the smallest black hole ever detected. The journal Science published their results online today.

David Merritt, Laura Ferrarese and Charles Joseph used Hubble data to calculate an upper limit for the size of a black hole in M33. They concluded that it could be no bigger than a slight 3,000 solar masses. "For the first time, we are able to put a constraint on a black hole, which is a thousand times or three orders of magnitude less massive than the least massive black hole that has been detected," Ferrarese says.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

The Hubble observations agree with predictions based on a relationship that Ferrarese and Merritt proposed this past year. It states that the size of a black hole is related to the speed at which the stars in its galaxy are moving. The agreement, Ferrarese says, "implies that small black holes, if they exist, formed in much the same way as the very massive ones."

The researchers are hoping to obtain more time to use Hubble so that they can observe M33 further and unravel its black hole mystery. "Detecting black holes of only a few thousand solar masses is observationally challenging," Merritt says, "but it is critical for establishing how supermassive black holes relate to their host galaxies, and which mechanisms influence the formation and evolution of both."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American