Scientists Identify Flamingo's Short-Legged Kin

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

At first glance, the elegant flamingo¿with its graceful long legs and delicate, arched neck¿seems to have little in common with the duck-like grebe (below). But according to two new studies published in the July 7 issue of the Journal of the Royal Society, these birds have more in common with each other than with any other¿at least genetically speaking.

Image: PENN STATE

"We knew people might have a hard time accepting these results so we decided to publish our two studies together in the same paper because the weight of the combined evidence is quite strong," Blair Hedges, an evolutionary biologist at the Pennsylvania State University, says. To investigate how closely the two species are related, Hedges' team compared the actual sequence of base pairs in the birds' DNA. The other team, led by John Kirsch, director of the Zoological Museum at the University of Wisconsin, conducted DNA/DNA hybridization to perform an overall comparison of the two species' entire genomes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: PENN STATE

"We never imagined the flamingo and the grebe would turn out to be closest relatives, and were so surprised by this outcome that we did additional examinations using different sources of flamingo and grebe genetic material and obtained the same results," Hedges says. One implication of this study is that physical features such as the flamingo's long legs probably didn't evolve only once, but evolved separately in different families of birds. "A lot of people may have trouble believing the results from these genetic studies for a while, but they carry a lot of weight because we have so much data," Hedges adds. "What I like about the way science works is that eventually the truth will win."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe