Scientists Identify Genetic Underpinnings of Some Sudden Infant Deaths

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Nearly 3,000 babies a year die suddenly in their sleep in the U.S., leaving devastated parents wondering what went wrong. Findings published online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences offer insight into the genetic basis of one type of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). ¿This is one of the first genetic sub-classifications of SIDS,¿ says study leader Dietrich A. Stephan of the Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen) in Phoenix, Ariz. ¿And it's going to be helpful in offering parents answers for sudden infant deaths, recognizing predisposition early, and hopefully saving a number of these babies.¿

The researchers identified children who suffered from a specific form of SIDS known as SIDDT in an Amish community in Pennsylvania. Twenty-one infants from nine families had passed away before the age of one and the scientists analyzed DNA from four of the babies as well as their parents, siblings and close relatives. The researchers identified an alteration in a gene on chromosome 6 called TSPYL: all four children had two abnormal copies of the gene, and their parents each carried one copy of the alteration. TSPYL is expressed in the brain stem, and sudden deaths may occur because of changes to the brain's regulatory systems that govern cardiac and pulmonary protective reflexes, the team reports. The researchers will next investigate the relationship between TSPYL mutations and SIDS in the general population, as well as the gene's role in controlling breathing and heart rate in premature infants that are otherwise normal.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American