New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Scientists Identify SARS Receptor

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) originated in southern China in November 2002, and soon spread to people on six continents, killing nearly 800 people all told. For the first time, researchers have identified a crucial SARS receptor in vivo that helps explain how and why SARS infection causes lung failure. The findings should help researchers treat other diseases that compromise lung function.

Previous research using cell lines had identified ACE2, a protein involved in regulating blood pressure, as a potential SARS receptor. Now Josef Penninger of the Institute of Molecular Biotechnology (IMBA) in Vienna, Austria, and his colleagues have tested the hypothesis in mice. In a paper published online yesterday by Nature Medicine, they report that SARS infection, and specifically the SARS protein known as Spike, reduces ACE2 expression. As a result, blood vessels in the lungs become damaged and the lung becomes flooded as a result.

In a second paper published in the current issue of the journal Nature, the same team of scientists reports that treating mice with ACE2 can protect the animals from lung failure brought on by another condition, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). "We of course need to extend these findings in mice now to humans," Penninger says. "Yet in essence, SARS pointed us to a protein that may help millions of people affected with a previously untreatable disease." Indeed, John Nicholls and Malik Peiris of the University of Hong Kong note in an accompanying commentary in Nature Medicine that the results could be applied to acute lung injuries arising from viruses and other causes, including a potential avian flu pandemic.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe