Scientists Identify SARS Receptor

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) originated in southern China in November 2002, and soon spread to people on six continents, killing nearly 800 people all told. For the first time, researchers have identified a crucial SARS receptor in vivo that helps explain how and why SARS infection causes lung failure. The findings should help researchers treat other diseases that compromise lung function.

Previous research using cell lines had identified ACE2, a protein involved in regulating blood pressure, as a potential SARS receptor. Now Josef Penninger of the Institute of Molecular Biotechnology (IMBA) in Vienna, Austria, and his colleagues have tested the hypothesis in mice. In a paper published online yesterday by Nature Medicine, they report that SARS infection, and specifically the SARS protein known as Spike, reduces ACE2 expression. As a result, blood vessels in the lungs become damaged and the lung becomes flooded as a result.

In a second paper published in the current issue of the journal Nature, the same team of scientists reports that treating mice with ACE2 can protect the animals from lung failure brought on by another condition, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). "We of course need to extend these findings in mice now to humans," Penninger says. "Yet in essence, SARS pointed us to a protein that may help millions of people affected with a previously untreatable disease." Indeed, John Nicholls and Malik Peiris of the University of Hong Kong note in an accompanying commentary in Nature Medicine that the results could be applied to acute lung injuries arising from viruses and other causes, including a potential avian flu pandemic.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe