New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Scientists Image Sun's Surface in 3-D

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



Astronomers have taken the most detailed pictures yet of the edge of our sun. The images, presented yesterday at the meeting of the American Astronomical Society's Solar Physics Division in Laurel, Md., are twice as clear as previous images and reveal the sun's surface to be surprisingly uneven.

Researchers led by Tom Berger of Lockheed Martin's Solar and Astrophysics Lab (LMSAL) in Palo Alto, Calif., used the Swedish one-meter Solar Telescope (SST) on the island of La Palma to inspect the visible edge of the sun, known as the solar limb. "Until recently we thought of the solar photosphere as the relatively flat and featureless 'surface' of the sun, punctuated only by an occasional sunspot," Berger says. Instead the new observations show dark sunspots nestled amoung mountainous 450-kilometer-high peaks. The surface's irregular pattern is made up of so-called granules--formed by the convection of heat--with each granule covering an area the size of Texas. In addition, the team determined the detailed structure of bright spots on the sun known as faculae (meaning "little torches"), which can reach between 150 and 400 kilometers in length.

The scientists also collected magnetic data from sunspots and faculae and compared it to the new 3-D images. They found that the more intense faculae aligned exactly with the magnetic field, supporting the link between faculae brightness and increased solar radiation during periods of high solar magnetic activity. Notes John Lawrence of California State University Northridge, "With this new discovery, we can hope to incorporate the effects of magnetoconvection into solar irradiance models to better predict variations in solar output."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe