New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Scientists Manufacture Nanomotor

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "get your motor running" when the structure in question is just 500 nanometers wide--so small that it would take 300 to match the width of a human hair. But researchers describe such a device today in the journal Nature. The electric rotor could eventually be put to a variety of uses ranging from optical switching to microfluidics.

Alex Zettl of the University of California, Berkeley, and his colleagues fashioned the motor by affixing a multiwalled carbon nanotube to a silicon wafer and attaching a gold square about 200 nanometers wide to the tube. The team then selectively etched parts of the wafer so the metal blade could rotate freely. By varying the voltage applied to different parts of the wafer, the scientists could control how the metal plate moved. (A composite of still images of the rotor taken by a scanning electron microscope is shown above.) "It's the smallest synthetic motor that's ever been made," Zettl notes. "Nature is still a little bit ahead of us--there are biological motors that are equal or slightly smaller in size--but we are catching up."

Unlike some current tiny motors, the authors note that their model is "designed to operate over a wide range of frequency, temperature, and environmental conditions, including high vacuum and harsh chemical environments." The researchers also hope to miniaturize the motor even more, perhaps by a factor of five. "There are many very fundamental questions we are trying to answer," Zettl says. "The flip side is, we've got this incredibly neat little motor that's smaller than any other electric motor--let's try to integrate it into some larger architecture where people are making microelectromechanical devices or nanoelectromechanical devices."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe