Scientists Take DNA's Temperature

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The temperature most often associated with human life is 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit, that of a healthy person. Now scientists have succeeded in taking a different measurement, one they've dubbed the "heat of life:" the energies involved in DNA replication and synthesis.

Kenneth J. Breslauer of Rutgers University and his colleagues used an ultrasensitive calorimeter to measure the miniscule reaction heats associated with DNA synthesis in Escherichia coli. The team isolated a specific section of DNA and labeled parts with radioactive markers. The thermal detection system, which is accurate to a millionth of a calorie, determined the amount of heat given off when a base pair was inserted into the DNA strand. According to the report, which is published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the amount of energy involved depends on which base pair is inserted into the strand. "Our measurements represent the first direct determination of the energies and their transformations in this most fundamental process in biological chemistry," Breslauer says.

The researchers note that their findings are a first step toward assembling a database of the energies involved in proper DNA construction. Knowing the quantities to expect could help scientists identify incorrect synthesis, which can lead to mutations and illness. "This knowledge can position us to begin to intervene, enabling us to halt incorrect synthesis though the introduction of highly targeted external agents," Breslauer explains. "It is a foundation that is a necessary, but not sufficient, step in the direction of being able to understand and to regulate DNA synthesis, not only in the lab, but in living organisms."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe