Scientists Track the Origins of Malaria

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Malaria may not be an ancient plague but rather a fairly young one¿about 10,000 years young. According to a study published Friday in Science, the initial spread of the disease parallels that of agriculture and early human civilization. So by looking at mutations in our own genes, scientists can track malaria's origins.

"This is a striking example of how infectious disease can shape the path of human evolution," says lead author Sarah Tishkoff of the University of Maryland. She looked at the human gene G6PD (glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase) and found that some people have a mutation that makes them immune to malaria. When tracing the mutation back, she found that it emerged simultaneously with early agriculture.

The link between agriculture and malaria lies with the animal that transmits the disease: the mosquito. Scientists estimate that between 7,000 and 12,000 years ago, temperature and humidity in Africa increased dramatically and created lakes and pools of water, breeding grounds for bugs. At the same time, larger human populations that stayed in one place made it easier for the disease to spread. "One mutation found throughout Africa arose within the past 3,830 to 11,760 years," Tishkoff says. "This estimate is consistent with archaeological and historical documents that show malaria has had a significant impact on humans only within the past 10,000 years, since the origination of agriculture."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Tishkoff found another mutation of G6PD in the Mediterranean region, the Middle East and India, which developed more recently¿1,600 to 6,640 years ago. She thinks that the army of Alexander the Great may have brought a different strain of malaria to the regions when it conquered them in the fourth century B.C. "This study," Tishkoff says, "demonstrates how the environment, culture, genes and history interact to shape patterns of variation in the modern human genome."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe