Scientists Tripped People for Science  

An elaborate setup allowed researchers to study how people stumble and recover 

Researchers successfully triggered 190 stumbles.

Shane King and Maura Eveld Vanderbilt University

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A study participant walks briskly on a treadmill, video cameras recording his every move, when a 35-pound metal block suddenly appears in his path. Special eyeglasses prevent him from seeing it, and he stumbles, lurching forward—until he is caught by a safety harness. One trip down, dozens more to go.

Researchers developed the treacherous treadmill to study how people regain their footing after tripping. They knew this usually means taking an exaggerated step that allows the central nervous system to reorient the body's center of gravity above firm footing, says Michael Goldfarb, a mechanical engineer at Vanderbilt University and co-author of the treadmill study. But “the way you do that changes depending on what your [body's] configuration was when you stumbled,” Goldfarb adds.

People with prosthetic legs often struggle to recover from a stumble and thus fall at far higher rates than the general population. Understanding how people trip and recover on two legs could help researchers design better prosthetics.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To trigger genuine tripping, researchers had to deliver the heavy blocks surreptitiously. Goldfarb and his colleagues' apparatus, described in June in the Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, works because it can place a heavy block on the treadmill so delicately that participants do not perceive it until they have already tripped. An algorithm determines where to place the block so the researchers can observe stumble responses at different points in a subject's gait.

The surprise is key, but participants in this kind of study know they will eventually be tripped up—which could confound results, says Mark Grabiner, a biomechanicist at the University of Illinois at Chicago, who was not involved in the new work. Researchers have taken various approaches to this problem in the past, sometimes not even telling participants they are in a tripping study, Grabiner says. The new study's stealthy design is “an incremental improvement over existing technologies”—a step in the right direction—he adds.

In the next phase of the study, Goldfarb says, his team will use the tripping data to program reflexive stumble responses for a variety of situations in prosthetic limbs.

Jim Daley is a freelance journalist from Chicago. He writes about science and health.

More by Jim Daley
Scientific American Magazine Vol 321 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Falling for Science” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 321 No. 3 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0919-16b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe