Scientists Uncover the Chemical Complexities of Mummification

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: ¿BRITISH MUSEUM

Ancient Egyptian mummies stand as emblems of the chemical prowess of natural compounds for preserving human remains. Because Egyptian belief held that it was necessary for a part of the spirit known as the ka to return to the body to facilitate entry into the afterlife, embalmers honed techniques of mummification to maintain the body in a life-like form long after death. Now Stephen A. Buckley and Richard P. Evershed of the University of Bristol, writing in this week's Nature, provide a detailed chemical analysis of the compounds those Egyptian embalmers used.

The scientists examined 13 mummies spanning more than 2,000 years, including the peak period of mummification around 1,000 B.C. Using a combination of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry, the scientists searched for organic compounds resistant to degradation that serve as markers for specific balms and embalming agents. The diversity of materials used by the ancient embalmers, they determined, is greater than previously reported. In an accompanying commentary, Sarah Wisseman of the University of Illinois notes that this "could be a result of economics (the cost and availability of the materials), changing fashions, and/or the preferences of particular embalming guilds."

The team also tracked the evolution of embalming. "The use of drying oils was clearly widespread," they write, "with coniferous resins and beeswax increasing in importance with time." Coniferous resins, the scientists explain, can slow microbial degradation, whereas beeswax has antibacterial properties and serves as a sealant. Given that no detailed written records of the process exist, the findings shed much needed light on the role of organic preservatives in mummification.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe