New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Scientists Uncover the Chemical Complexities of Mummification

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: ¿BRITISH MUSEUM

Ancient Egyptian mummies stand as emblems of the chemical prowess of natural compounds for preserving human remains. Because Egyptian belief held that it was necessary for a part of the spirit known as the ka to return to the body to facilitate entry into the afterlife, embalmers honed techniques of mummification to maintain the body in a life-like form long after death. Now Stephen A. Buckley and Richard P. Evershed of the University of Bristol, writing in this week's Nature, provide a detailed chemical analysis of the compounds those Egyptian embalmers used.

The scientists examined 13 mummies spanning more than 2,000 years, including the peak period of mummification around 1,000 B.C. Using a combination of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry, the scientists searched for organic compounds resistant to degradation that serve as markers for specific balms and embalming agents. The diversity of materials used by the ancient embalmers, they determined, is greater than previously reported. In an accompanying commentary, Sarah Wisseman of the University of Illinois notes that this "could be a result of economics (the cost and availability of the materials), changing fashions, and/or the preferences of particular embalming guilds."

The team also tracked the evolution of embalming. "The use of drying oils was clearly widespread," they write, "with coniferous resins and beeswax increasing in importance with time." Coniferous resins, the scientists explain, can slow microbial degradation, whereas beeswax has antibacterial properties and serves as a sealant. Given that no detailed written records of the process exist, the findings shed much needed light on the role of organic preservatives in mummification.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe