Sea Ice, Near Record Low, Is Not Rebounding

Winter regrowth may be slower than usual

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A light winter snow fell on Barrow, Alaska, this week as scientists reported that the ice cover off Barrow’s Arctic shores had declined to its second-lowest level in satellite history, tied with 2007.

The National Snow and Ice Data Center in Colorado reported yesterday that 1.6 million square miles of ice covered the Arctic Ocean on Saturday.

As a result, Alaska’s Beaufort and Chukchi seas contain unusually large patches of ice-free waters. Canada’s southern Northwest Passage routes also appear to be open, although some ice was reported in Russia’s Northern Sea route, scientists said.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


According to satellite records begun in 1978, the lowest levels of Arctic ice ever recorded occurred in 2012, when the polar ice cap shrunk to roughly 1.3 million acres.

Scientists note that although this year’s Arctic ice cover appears to be growing as winter approaches, a new round of melting is still possible if the region is hit by changing winds or a late-season melt.

This summer’s low ice levels follow the winter of 2015-2016, which saw record low levels of Arctic ice. Data center researchers reported that maps of sea ice age indicate that the ice pack in March was much thinner than normal.

From March into June, the Arctic ice maximum extent hit record lows. However, July and August saw stormy, cool and cloudy conditions. The ice melt accelerated again early this month when the region was hit by a series of storms along Alaska’s northern shores.

“The record makes it clear that the ice is not rebounding to where it used to be, even in the midst of the winter,” Claire Parkinson, main author of the study and a senior climate scientist with NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., explained in a statement.

The low Arctic sea ice conditions are bad news for hunters and whalers in Barrow and other Native villages in Alaska that rely on subsistence hunting. They traditionally build ice camps far from shore to reach remote populations of migrating marine life.

Ocean Conservancy President Janis Searles Jones noted that the lack of sea ice also hurts polar bears and other wildlife that live on the coastal ice floes.

“The loss of summer sea ice also opens up the Arctic to increasing vessel traffic and the risks that come with it like higher risk of oil spills, impact of noise pollution on marine wildlife and the introduction of invasive species,” Jones said in a statement.

Reprinted from ClimateWire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net. Click here for the original story.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe