Seattle Suburb Making Progress against E. Coli in Water Supply

A Seattle suburb was making progress cleansing its E. coli-contaminated water supply through system-wide flushes and chlorine injections, a task made more urgent after the potentially deadly bacteria sickened a child, officials said on Tuesday.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Eric M. Johnson

SEATTLE (Reuters) - A Seattle suburb was making progress cleansing its E. coli-contaminated water supply through system-wide flushes and chlorine injections, a task made more urgent after the potentially deadly bacteria sickened a child, officials said on Tuesday.

Tests first showed the bacteria in the water supply on Mercer Island on Sept. 26, forcing area schools to close for a day as health officials collected thousands of samples to try to locate the source of the contamination.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The alert was lifted last week in the city of 24,000 people only to be reimposed after another water sample test on Thursday again indicated the presence of E. coli. Officials said later a Mercer Island child had fallen ill from the bacteria.

"We know this incident has been challenging, and we thank islanders for their patience," Mayor Bruce Bassett said in a statement. "We are all eager to see life return to normal, but our first priority is protecting the health of our citizens."

The city, whose businesses and residents have been under orders to boil tap water, said it had flushed extra volumes of water and more than double the normal concentrations of E. coli-killing chlorine through its roughly 100 miles of water pipes.

Since then, 90 water-sample tests over five days have turned up clear of the fecal coliform bacteria that indicate the presence of sewage or animal waste in the water supply.

City spokesman Ross Freeman said the boil-water order could be lifted as early as Wednesday when Mercer Island officials meet with the state's health department.

Freeman said officials could lift the ban if they see a sixth day of clear water and the completion of system-wide inspections. They were also looking for longer-term safety proposals, such as a permanent chlorine-injection system at water reservoirs.

The cause of the bacteria, which can lead to severe illness, such as kidney failure, or even death, remains unknown, Freeman said.

More than half of the suburb's restaurants were operating with limited menus, and the city was helping small-business owners apply for a "Disaster Assistance Loan program," the city's statement said.

 

(Reporting by Eric M. Johnson; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Peter Cooney)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe