October 15, 2014
1 min read
Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAmSecond Dallas Nurse Contracts Ebola
Texas health authorities report a second health care worker who treated Thomas Eric Duncan has tested positive for Ebola
By Christine Gorman
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Texas Health authorities reported early this morning that a second Dallas nurse from Texas Presbyterian Hospital has tested postive for Ebola. The woman presumably was infected while caring for Thomas Eric Duncan, the first person to becme sick with Ebola while in the United States. Confirmation tests are being performed at the Centers for Disease Control.
The news further highlights how little margin there is for error when treating an Ebola patient and strongly suggests that health care workers were not adequately trained to handle Ebola cases at the hospital. Separately, a group of nurses from Texas Presbyterian spoke with reporters anonymously on a teleconference alleging a "confused and chaotic" response at the hospital when Duncan first arrived.
On Tuesday the CDC announced that it has created an Ebola response team that will fly to any hospital with a confirmed Ebola case within hours. “I wish we had put a team like this on the ground the day the first patient was diagnosed,” director Thomas Frieden conceded in a news conference announcing the move.
Meanwhile, the World Health Organization predicted that the number of new Ebola cases in west Africa in the next two months could rise to 10,000 cases per week.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber