Secret Test of Google AI Bot Stops Top Go Players

Updated version of DeepMind’s AlphaGo program was behind a mystery online competitor  

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A mystery player causing a stir in the world of the complex strategy game Go has been revealed as an updated version of AlphaGo, the artificial-intelligence (AI) program created by Google's London-based AI firm, DeepMind.

Known only by the name ‘Master(P)’, since late December the anonymous player has beaten the world’s best at Go in a string of online games, including defeating current world number one, 19-year-old Ke Jie.

Go is regarded as the most complex board game ever invented, and is famously difficult for computers to crack. But last year, AlphaGo showcased the strength of AI software when it stunned the Go world, first by defeating a professional human player, Fan Hui, and then going on tobeat one of the Go world's top players, Lee Sedol.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Fellow players had a hunch that Master(P) was probably also an AI program. It came out of nowhere to win dozens of consecutive quick-fire games across two separate online platforms. And on 4 January, Google DeepMind chief executive Demis Hassabis revealed on Twitter that Master(P) is a new prototype version of AlphaGo. The "unofficial" games were designed to test the prototype, he said: "We're excited by the results and also by what we and the Go community can learn from some of the innovative and successful moves played by the new version of AlphaGo."

Victory prize

Playing on the online servers Tygem and FoxGo, Master(P) played more than 50 games, winning in all—except perhaps for one game, which, according to some reports, was deemed a tie only because the network connection of the opponent, the Go professional Chen Yaoye, timed out. “It’s extremely impressive whoever/whatever it is,” said British Go player Jon Diamond ahead of the announcement. After losing to Master(P), Chinese professional Gu Li offered a reward of 100,000 yuan (US$14,400) to any human who could beat the mysterious player.

Although AlphaGo was rumoured to be behind the bot, many observers also suspected that another team had created an AI that could master the game, something both Chinese and South Korean scientists have said they are attempting to do.

Hassabis said that the new version of AlphaGo would play official, full-length games later this year. How strong it will be in more high-profile tournaments remains unclear, because the rules of such matches differ from those played in online forums.

Online games are usually played at a faster pace, which favours the computer over humans, says Rémi Coulom, a freelance developer of Go programs based in Lille, France. "But still, I expect a strong correlation with performance in serious slow tournament games,” he adds.

AlphaGo has only played around a dozen public games, so Google DeepMind's decision to trial its latest version in the open will allow Go players to study more of its moves.

“I personally think it's fantastic that there are all these games for people to look at and study. There are lots of moves that are really new and surprising,” says Niall Cardin, a UK-based Go player.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on January 4, 2016.

Elizabeth Gibney is a senior physics reporter for Nature magazine.

More by Elizabeth Gibney

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe