Secretive Military Jets Pose Threat to Civil Planes

Military jets which fly over Europe without identifying themselves pose a high risk to civilian aircraft, aviation safety officials said in a report published on Tuesday

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Adrian Croft

BRUSSELS, April 14 (Reuters) - Military jets which fly over Europe without identifying themselves pose a high risk to civilian aircraft, aviation safety officials said in a report published on Tuesday, after a spate of near-collisions involving Russian warplanes.

The European Commission asked the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) to investigate after recent reports of the near-misses between commercial airliners and Russian military planes flying without electronic identification.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Russian planes have stepped up patrols over Europe and NATO has responded by sending more fighters to police Baltic skies amid an increase in tensions sparked by the Ukraine crisis.

EASA's report, released by the Commission, found that safety incidents involving civil and "non-cooperative" military aircraft over the high seas, particularly over the Baltic Sea, had significantly increased in 2014.

"The risk assessment ... concludes that the risk to civil aviation is high and this means that mitigating measures to reduce the risk to an acceptable level need to be taken," said the report, which did not mention Russia by name.

EASA also cited a significant increase in "non-cooperative" military activity over the Baltic Sea in recent years.

"Non-cooperative" planes are aircraft that do not file a flight plan or talk to civil air traffic controllers and turn off their transponders, or electronic identifiers.

Britain said on Tuesday it had scrambled Typhoon fighter jets to intercept two Russian long-range bombers near British airspace.

EASA said there had been 13 incidents in the Baltic region in 2014 in which two aircraft flew close enough to jeopardise their safety and three airspace infringements. That was up from five safety incidents and one airspace infringement in 2013.

Military planes that did not communicate or file flight plans were involved in most of the incidents last year, the report said, without naming the countries involved.

 

TENSIONS

Despite the focus on the Baltic, several other EU member states reported an increase in secretive military flights in the Atlantic, Black Sea and Aegean Sea, the report said.

EASA urged governments to harmonise and publish operational requirements for their air forces to ensure that the military paid proper attention to civilian planes.

It urged governments to harmonise civil/military coordination procedures for air traffic management at the EU level.

Swedish authorities said last December that a Russian military jet had nearly collided with a commercial passenger airplane near southern Sweden, but Moscow insisted its jet had kept at a safe distance. NATO accused Russia at the time of posing a danger to civil aviation in the Baltic region.

East-West tensions rose after a Malaysian airliner was downed over eastern Ukraine last July. Western experts say it was most likely shot down by a ground-to-air missile fired from territory held by pro-Russian separatists. (Additional reporting by Julia Fioretti; Editing by Gareth Jones)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe