New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

See How Stress Affects Inflammatory Bowel Disease

In inflammatory bowel disease, mental stress can produce two painful responses

Graphic shows a human figure with an arrow leading from the pituitary gland in the brain to adrenal glands on the kidneys. Additional arrows lead from the adrenal glands to the intestines.

Now Medical Studios

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Bouts of disabling pain, bleeding, weight loss and hospitalization that sometimes require surgery: that's the lot of about three million adults in the U.S. who suffer from inflammatory bowel disease, or IBD. (The illness has two main forms, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. It is frequently associated with an overactive immune system and may have a genetic component.) Treatments often involve some variety of immunosuppressant such as a steroid drug. But even controlled cases have periodic flare-ups, and the reasons have been hard to pin down.

Now scientists have traced two detailed molecular pathways from the brain to the gut that produce IBD flares. And in three different groups of IBD patients, they found that psychological stress—a death in the family or a bad fight with a loved one, for instance—can trigger the release of brain chemicals that cause IBD symptoms. This doesn't mean IBD is all in the head, emphasizes Christoph A. Thaiss of the University of Pennsylvania, one of the researchers. But it does mean psychotherapy and targeted stress-management techniques have important—and until now underappreciated—roles to play in preventing and treating agonizing flares.

Now Medical Studios; Source: “The Enteric Nervous System Relays Psychological Stress to Intestinal Inflammation,” by Kai Markus Schneider et al., in Cell, Vol. 186; June 22, 2023 (reference)

Josh Fischman was formerly senior editor for special projects at Scientific American and covered medicine, biology and science policy. He has written and edited about science and health for Discover, ScienceEarth and U.S. News & World Report. Follow Fischman on Bluesky @jfischman.bsky.social

More by Josh Fischman

Now Medical Studios is a multidisciplinary studio that creates medical illustrations and animations for clients in the pharmaceutical and healthcare industries.

More by Now Medical Studios
Scientific American Magazine Vol 329 Issue 2This article was published with the title “The Brain-Gut Connection” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 329 No. 2 (), p. 86
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0923-86

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe