New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

See It, Grab It

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When you open your eyes and reach out to shut off the alarm clock, two distinct brain systems are activated: one recognizes the clock, and the other guides your hand. Neuroscientists have long been aware of this “dissociation” between the recognition and guidance systems, but they had not been able to observe both in action. Now Lior Shmuelof and Ehud Zohary of Hebrew University in Jerusalem have used functional magnetic resonance imaging to see the duality in action in human volunteers.

The subjects watched videos of hands entering the screen from one side and grasping objects on the opposite side. Most previous studies of the two visual systems, Shmuelof explains, “were of people who had had brain damage. Those suffering from agnosia could not recognize objects, whereas those with ataxia could identify objects but could not guide their hands to grab them.” He says his work with Zohary is the first to test individuals for whom both systems operate normally.

“Our study confirmed that there are two systems,” Shmuelof says, “but it also found that this model is too simple. Some parietal brain regions, associated with planning to grasp objects, are also involved in observing actions” taken by others (the hand on the screen) to grasp objects. The team is eager to figure out what function this dual activity serves.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe