See the Best Fossil Octopus Ever Found

Paleontologists have recently provided a new look at a beautifully preserved cephalopod

Octopus body shapes diversified widely earlier in evolutionary history than previously thought.

From “Proteroctopus Ribeti in Coleoid Evolution,” by Isabelle Kruta et al., in Palaeontology, Vol. 59; November 2016

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A good cephalopod fossil is hard to find. Although ammonite shells, belemnite guards and other indicators of hard body parts are abundant in the fossil record, paleontologists seldom get to see the characteristic soft-tissue anatomy of these many-armed swimmers. Finds are so rare that one from 1982 still stands out: a 165-million-year-old fossilized octopus uncovered in France.

J. C. Fischer and B. Riou named the eight-armed invertebrate Proteroctopus ribeti and described its suckers to the delight of other paleontologists. But despite its unprecedented level of detail, the fossil looked deflated—an animal preserved as a squished version of its former self. That made it difficult to figure out the particulars of the specimen's anatomy and how it related to other octopuses. More than three decades later paleontologist Isabelle Kruta of Pierre and Marie Curie University in Paris and her colleagues have provided more detail about what this emblematic cephalopod looked like when alive. They reconstructed the animal in 3-D using synchrotron microtomography, a high-definition imaging technique.

Reinflated and restored, Proteroctopus most likely falls within a major octopus group called Vampyropoda—which contains the common octopus as well as the vampire “squid.” With the new images, the researchers found that Proteroctopus looked something like today's deep-sea forms of Vampyropoda—with a few differences. For instance, the ancient specimen has eight arms and a fin sticking out on either side of its body. Proteroctopus also lacks an ink sac, like the modern Vampyroteuthis. But the suckers of this Jurassic invertebrate are obliquely offset from one another rather than occurring side by side as in many extant octopuses. The study was published last fall in Palaeontology.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


What Proteroctopus can tell us about the ancestral octopus will rely on finding more fossils, but the specimen adds to an emerging consensus that octopus body shapes were already widely diversified by about 164 million years ago. “[Characteristics] we thought were quite recent in the evolution of the group, such as the shape of some suckers, were already present in the Jurassic,” Kruta says. As for what else the fossil record holds, paleontologists would surely give an arm and a leg to know.

Riley Black, who formerly wrote under the name Brian Switek, is the author of Skeleton Keys and My Beloved Brontosaurus. She lives in Salt Lake City, Utah. Follow her on Twitter @Laelaps and on Instagram @laelaps

More by Riley Black
Scientific American Magazine Vol 316 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Fossil Octopus Is a Jurassic Jewel” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 316 No. 3 (), p. 21
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0317-21

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe