Transparent Rats Give Scientists Clear View to Innards

New technique turns rodent bodies transparent

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One thing is clear:peering inside animals leads to scientific discovery. In the 1960s and 1970s genetic and developmental biology research exploded after laboratories began studying naturally transparent critters, such as the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and the zebra fishDanio rerio. With them, scientists could watch young cells develop into a full organism. Now, for the first time, they can see through mammalian bodies, thanks to a technique that can make mice and rats— and perhaps larger animals—clear.

Scientists have been able to render tissues such as the mammal brain transparent, but the procedure can take months. To speed up the process and apply it on a larger scale, Viviana Gradinaru, a neuroscientist at the California Institute of Technology, exploited a rodent’s blood vessels. Using a dead rat, the team pumped a series of chemicals through its vessels and into its tissues. The compounds removed cloudy fats and replaced them with clear liquids. In just two weeks the entire rat turned into a see-through, jellylike specimen. The researchers published their results (including photographs, if you’re not about to eat) in August in Cell.

Postclearing, Gradinaru can look at cells that have been tagged with antibodies or dyes. That ability could help others map nerve fibers or follow cancer cells. “We can see things that we couldn’t before,” says Guangping Gao, a gene therapist at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, who wants to track viruses in the body. Gradinaru says the technique could be scaled to any organism with vasculature—even humans.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe