New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

See through the Glasswing Butterfly’s Fascinating Wings

New research shows how these transparent wings develop

Butterfly on paper.

Aaron Pomerantz

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

True to their name, glasswing butterflies sport remarkably transparent wings that help them hide in plain sight. New work shows how narrow, bristlelike scales and a waxy, glare-cutting coating combine to make parts of the wings nearly invisible.

Most moths and butterflies get their vibrant colors from flat scales that tile the wing surface like shingles; relatively few species have clear wings. Nipam Patel, an evolutionary and developmental biologist at the Marine Biology Laboratory, first investigated the wings of several such species with his students in an embryology class. “It was amazing,” he says, “because they found every way you could imagine to have a transparent wing—from having see-through scales to no scales at all.”

Butterfly wing.

Credit: Aaron Pomerantz


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Previous studies that explored the structural diversity and optical properties of wing transparency involved adult specimens held in museums, so the developmental processes underlying transparency were largely unknown. For a new study in the Journal of Experimental Biology, Patel and his colleagues raised glasswing butterflies and tracked their wing development, creating the first detailed time-series record of the process. Their work shows that glasswing butterflies grow sparse, narrow bristles for the clear patches as well as broader scales (top right), using fewer scale precursor cells than other butterflies do.

Hand holding a butterfly with transparent wings.

Credit: Aaron Pomerantz

Colorless wings can be shiny, so butterflies have evolved ways of reducing reflected light. Using powerful electron microscopes, the researchers took a closer look at nanopillars—minuscule structures that are known to prevent glare—scattered on the glassy wings' surface. The team saw that a regularly spaced layer of nanopillars made from chitin, a fibrous substance found in insect exoskeletons, supports an irregular layer of nanopillars made from a waxy chemical that significantly lowers the amount of reflected light. The researchers say these findings could inspire new antireflective materials.

The study also sets the groundwork for future efforts to pinpoint the genetic mechanisms by which butterfly and moth color (or the lack thereof) evolves, says Cornell University ecologist Robert Reed, who was not involved with the study. “Scales are the evolutionary innovation that marks moths and butterflies,” Reed notes, “so it's kind of remarkable that there has been a reversion of sorts [from color to colorless] in some species.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe