See through the Glasswing Butterfly’s Fascinating Wings

New research shows how these transparent wings develop

Butterfly on paper.

Aaron Pomerantz

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

True to their name, glasswing butterflies sport remarkably transparent wings that help them hide in plain sight. New work shows how narrow, bristlelike scales and a waxy, glare-cutting coating combine to make parts of the wings nearly invisible.

Most moths and butterflies get their vibrant colors from flat scales that tile the wing surface like shingles; relatively few species have clear wings. Nipam Patel, an evolutionary and developmental biologist at the Marine Biology Laboratory, first investigated the wings of several such species with his students in an embryology class. “It was amazing,” he says, “because they found every way you could imagine to have a transparent wing—from having see-through scales to no scales at all.”

Butterfly wing.

Credit: Aaron Pomerantz


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Previous studies that explored the structural diversity and optical properties of wing transparency involved adult specimens held in museums, so the developmental processes underlying transparency were largely unknown. For a new study in the Journal of Experimental Biology, Patel and his colleagues raised glasswing butterflies and tracked their wing development, creating the first detailed time-series record of the process. Their work shows that glasswing butterflies grow sparse, narrow bristles for the clear patches as well as broader scales (top right), using fewer scale precursor cells than other butterflies do.

Hand holding a butterfly with transparent wings.

Credit: Aaron Pomerantz

Colorless wings can be shiny, so butterflies have evolved ways of reducing reflected light. Using powerful electron microscopes, the researchers took a closer look at nanopillars—minuscule structures that are known to prevent glare—scattered on the glassy wings' surface. The team saw that a regularly spaced layer of nanopillars made from chitin, a fibrous substance found in insect exoskeletons, supports an irregular layer of nanopillars made from a waxy chemical that significantly lowers the amount of reflected light. The researchers say these findings could inspire new antireflective materials.

The study also sets the groundwork for future efforts to pinpoint the genetic mechanisms by which butterfly and moth color (or the lack thereof) evolves, says Cornell University ecologist Robert Reed, who was not involved with the study. “Scales are the evolutionary innovation that marks moths and butterflies,” Reed notes, “so it's kind of remarkable that there has been a reversion of sorts [from color to colorless] in some species.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe