Seeing a Frisbee on the Sun

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: NASA/HST (top); Benjamin Bromley (bottom)

Move over, Hubble. There is a new space telescope in the works that scientists report will have enough resolve to spot a Frisbee on the sun. A paper describing the behemoth by Webster C. Cash of the University of Colorado, CU-Boulder research associates Ann Shipley and Steve Osterman of CASA and Marshall Joy of the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center appears in today's issue of Nature.

The new telescope, christened MAXIM, is designed to capture x-ray emissions, as does NASA's Chandra satellite, but with a resolution reaching 0.1 micro arc-second; that's about 1,000,000 times greater than Hubble's 0.1 arc-second resolution. "A millionfold increase in x-ray resolution over today's instruments will make objects in distant stellar systems appear as if they are here in our own solar system," Cash says. "We will see the discs of stars, image the formation of astrophysical jets and watch blobs of matter spiral into black holes." The image at right shows a comparison between Hubble's view of a suspected black hole (top) and an artist's conception of MAXIM's vantage (bottom).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Interferometry--a tactic that pools the information gathered by many telescope mirrors at once--is what gives this latest design its gain over Hubble and Chandra. And NASA, which has contributed about $750,000 so far to the project, is considering use of MAXIM in two missions set for sometime after 2010. First they plan to test the idea of interferometry--common for ground-based telescopes--in space on an upcoming Pathfinder mission. Providing all goes well, a full MAXIM mission would call for launching a fleet of some 33 tiny, mirror-carrying spacecraft, all flying in formation.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe