Seeing the Whole Picture

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Source: Science

Researchers at London¿s Birkbeck College have found that six-month-old infants don¿t see the world in the same way adults, or even eight-month olds, do. Indeed, new findings reported in the November 24 issue of Science suggest that before eight months, babies are unable to group the different attributes of a single object together to see it as a whole¿say, as we might automatically group the base and the shade of a lamp. To study this phenomenon, the researchers showed 11 six-month olds and 11 eight-month olds two different versions of a collection of Pacman-like shapes (see inset in image). In one version, the "mouths" of the Pacmen faced towards each other, forming a so-called Kanizsa Square; in the other, they didn¿t form a single object.

Earlier studies with adults showed that recognizing the Kanizsa Square framed by the Pacmen shapes prompted a burst of brain activity known as gamma oscillations. So the scientists looked for the same reaction in the babies, using a Geodesic Sensor Net¿a child-friendly form of an EEG. They discovered that whereas the older infants did show gamma oscillations when viewing the Kanizsa Square, the younger ones did not. "Understanding how an infant brain develops in obviously fascinating and may have implications for the education and care of babies," says lead author Gergely Csibra. "This new work not only tells us that babies as young as eight months recognize complex objects in the same way an adult does, but also allows us to think of new studies into early infant development.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe