Seeing through Soil with Sound

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: From the University of Illinois Bioacoustics Research Lab

In contrast to the swashbuckling adventures of Indiana Jones, archaeologists actually spend the vast majority of their fieldwork time doing something rather mundane: moving dirt. Although their traditional dig-and-sift method works well, it is labor-intensive and time-consuming--and therefore rather costly. As a result, researchers have increasingly enlisted the aid of imaging techniques such as ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and seismic exploration technologies to help narrow their search. Now another tool is in the works. According to a recent paper in the Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, University of Illinois researchers have developed a high-resolution imaging system based on sound waves that can detect small, buried objects. Additionally, they report, this acoustic technique could be adapted to search for land mines.

The new method "is similar to those used in seismic exploration, where an explosive charge is detonated and the reflected sound waves are picked up by an array of receivers," explains team member William O'Brien. "Because we use a much higher frequency, however, our resolution is much greater." The new method also outperforms GPR when the ground is wet. Currently the acoustic device can "see" about a foot underground, and resolve objects that are at least five centimeters in diameter, such as the buried, air-filled pipe in the image at the right. As such it probably won't be able to differentiate small artifacts like arrowheads from similarly sized rocks. (Land mines, on the other hand, may be easier to spot, owing in part to their larger size.) But the team is trying to hone the method. One way to achieve that, O'Brien notes, might be to incorporate a transmitter array that could focus the transmit beam. "With a focused source we could transmit more energy into the region of interest. That would allow us to penetrate farther and obtain better image quality."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe