New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Self-Destructing Circuits Mimic Mission: Impossible Tape

Electronic devices that decompose on schedule will be a boon to security tech and medical implants

A tape recorder featured at the beginning of Mission: Impossible episode: Underwater. The recording concludes with: This tape will self-destruct in five seconds.

This tape will self-destruct in five seconds.’ So ended the agents’ instructions in the long-running TV series Mission: impossible. While the idea of self-destructing tape was pure fantasy then, now researchers in China and the US have produced electronic devices that gradually decompose through reactions with water in the air. The researchers believe the device could have important applications not just in security but in environmental protection and potentially medicine too.

With electronic devices becoming ever more widespread, interest has grown in ‘transient electronics’, which would do their job and then decompose. This could cut electronic waste, and be useful in situations where recovering devices is troublesome. Sensors implanted in the human body, for example, can require further surgery to remove. However, the techniques used to break down transient circuitry usually involve using chemicals encapsulated in the material. This makes it difficult to adjust the lifetime of the circuit. Moreover, many common electronic materials, such as copper, can’t be used because they don’t break down.

Cunjiang Yu of the University of Houston in Texas and colleagues in China deposited materials common in the semiconductor industry, such as copper, magnesium oxide and indium gallium zinc oxide semiconductors, onto a polyanhydride substrate. Gradually, water vapour from the air hydrolysed the polymer’s anhydride groups, causing decomposition of the film. The carboxylic acid produced by the hydrolysis could break down electronic materials too. The researchers fabricated transient resistors, capacitors, transistors and other electronic components. The decomposition time could be varied from days to weeks and potentially even longer by altering the polymer’s anhydride content and the humidity. Yu suggests this could be achieved in real-world devices using packaging.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers now intend to put the technology to use in the field. They are looking at military applications first. ‘Soldiers these days carry so many smart devices,’ says Yu. ‘If a soldier dies in the field we don’t want the electronics they’re carrying to be deciphered by the enemy.’ For medical applications, they need to test the biocompatibility of the materials involved, but Yu says: ‘The acids involved aren’t very strong… My suspicions are that [the system] will be biocompatible.’

John Rogers of Northwestern University, US, is impressed. ‘It introduces the notion that you can use the substrate as the vehicle for triggering physical disintegration and dissolution of the electronics. That’s a new concept in transient electronics, which I believe is emerging as a pretty important technology.’ He suspects that the acidity, as well as the probable rapidity of hydrolysis in the moist environment of the body, may hinder biomedical uses, but he believes military applications are possible. ‘Ultimately, for those systems, the idea of a triggered transience is the holy grail,’ he says. ‘But a system like Cunjiang’s, in which a timer is built into the material dictating how long it will exist, is interesting.’

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on September 6, 2017.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe