November 12, 2014

5 min read

Google Logo Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm

Seven Images That Tell the Story of Frigid Weather in the U.S.

Unseasonably cold temperatures can be traced back to a typhoon that eventually struck Alaska

By Andrea Thompson & Climate Central

It started with a typhoon in the Western Pacific and will end with unseasonably cold temperatures across a vast swath of the country east of the Rocky Mountains.

The invasion of frigid Arctic air began on Monday, when temperatures began plummeting, first across the Northern Plains, and then bleeding southward as the Arctic air plowed over the landscape.

The event led to some pretty wild temperature swings — Denver saw the mercury drop more than 40°F in a matter of hours — and to some stark weather maps and photos. Here, we’ve rounded up some of the most arresting images of this unusual weather pattern.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Let’s start with that typhoon that helped get this early Arctic outbreak going: Typhoon Nuri spun up last week in the Western Pacific, reaching Category 5 hurricane status at its peak before weakening as it moved over colder waters. As it continued northward over the ocean, skirting Japan, it transitioned into an extratropical cyclone, deepening once again over the Bering Sea in a process called bombogenesis (one of the more evocative meteorological terms). The impressively strong storm can be seen in the below satellite image:

Nuri’s strength, along with some other atmospheric factors, helped set off a domino effect in the jet stream, with a high pressure ridge setting up shop over western Canada, letting loose a surge of Arctic air that plunged southward.

This setup, while not unheard of at this time of year, is unusual, said Brian Hurley, a meteorologist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Weather Prediction Center in College Park, Md.

“This kind of outbreak is about a month early,” he told Climate Central.

For example, in the part of the U.S. where the frigid onslaught began — the high Northern Plains, particularly in Wyoming and Montana — temperatures were a whopping 35°F below normal. That’s cold even by Montana’s standards.

If this outbreak had happened a month later, when the normal high temperatures will have plummeted, the difference wouldn’t be nearly as stark, Hurley said.

After crossing into the U.S., the bone-chilling air started “eventually sort of oozing its way southward and eastward,” with the southward component the “heart” of the coldest air, Hurley said.

As it bled over Colorado, the cold front provided quite a shock to residents, causing temperatures in Denver to drop a mind-boggling 44°F in just 6 hours (and more than 30°F of that drop came in less than hour in some spots). In Boulder, home to the National Center for Atmospheric Research, temperatures tanked by about 20°F in an hour.

“It was quite a shock indeed!  We're used to large temperature swings here, but even by Colorado standards this was a remarkably sharp cold front,” Bob Henson, an NCAR science writer, said. “Then the front itself was unmistakable as it approached — a wall of cloud with patches of virga sweeping in from the northwest.” (Virga is precipitation that doesn’t reach the ground.)

Adding to the weather whiplash were the signs of autumn that still lingered, even as the weather turned decidedly wintery: “We still have a few trees with bright color, which only added to the shock of going from a sunny, mild autumn morning to a winter-like afternoon,” Henson said in an email.

University of Colorado Boulder student Christopher Nie perfectly captured the seasonal change that happened in just a matter of hours in a set of photos:

Some of the best illustrations of the abruptness of the change came from regional and national temperature maps. This tweet from the Weather Channel shows the sharp change over a short distance as the cold front swept through Iowa, with a nice symmetry between the 27°F temperature on one side and the 72°F on the other:

National maps from Monday and Tuesday gave a broader view of the “oozing” of the temperatures, as Hurley called it:

Part of the reason for the stark contrasts in temperatures in these maps is again the unusually early timing of the Arctic outbreak. The differences wouldn’t be so stark a month or two from now. On top of that, parts of the East have been seeing temperatures around 10 to 15°F above normal for the time of year.

“Despite all the warnings and preparations urged by the weather community in Oklahoma, nothing could fully prepare us for such a strong wintry blast this early in the season, especially after the unusually warm weather we've had for the last two months or so,” Oklahoma state climatologist Gary McManus said in an email. Highs in the 70s and 80s were fitting since we seemingly went from summer in September and October to winter in the matter of a few hours.”

As the cold seeps more eastward in the coming days, the temperature change won’t be quite as drastic along the East Coast. Instead of Montana’s 35-degree difference, temperatures nearer the coast will be more like 10 to 15°F below normal.

“It will get cold,” Hurley said, but “not nearly as cold.”

The bad news, though, is that the cold looks like it will stick around for a while. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Centerhandles more long-range forecasts, looking out up to two weeks in advance. Their current 8-14 day temperature outlook map doesn’t look encouraging:

“East of the Rockies, really everything is shaded in blue,” Hurley said. Which means “it’s going to be awhile” until the chill potentially abates.

But, as Hurley points out, at least there don’t seem to be any snowstorms in store during that timeframe (beyond what fell Monday in northern Wisconsin and Michigan).

As the Minneapolis National Weather Service office put it, it could be worse:

You May Also Like: Waiting for El Niño. Still. Again. An Inside Look at How Monster Tornadoes Can Form LEDs the Fast-Rising Heroes of Efficiency 2014 Will Go Down As Hottest In California’s History

This article is reproduced with permission from Climate Central. The article was first published on November 11, 2014.

Andrea Thompson is senior desk editor for life science at Scientific American, covering the environment, energy and earth sciences. She has been covering these issues for nearly two decades. Prior to joining Scientific American, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered earth science and the environment. She has moderated panels, including as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Media Zone, and appeared in radio and television interviews on major networks. She holds a graduate degree in science, health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a B.S. and an M.S. in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Follow Thompson on Bluesky @andreatweather.bsky.social

More by Andrea Thompson
More by Climate Central

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe