New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Sex-changed Salmon

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: University of Idaho/BILL LOFTUS

For years salmon populations in the northwestern U.S. have been dwindling. As a result, a number of them are now endangered or extinct. Researchers have long suspected that degradation of the river ecosystems might play a leading role in the plight of these fish, but the idea had not been fully explored. New findings, though, suggest that in at least one case, what's going on is stranger than anyone had imagined. According to a report published today in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, tissue samples collected last year from fall chinook salmon spawning in the Columbia River (right) show that 84 percent of fish that appeared to be female carried male-specific genetic markers. "The best explanation for these results," says lead author James J. Nagler of the University of Idaho, "is that these females have been 'sex-reversed' and are in fact male."

Such reversals are not unheard of, as salmon sex can be reversed experimentally in the lab, Nagler reports. But these new findings document the phenomenon for the first time in a wild fish population. Earlier studies have shown that hormones can induce sex reversal in trout embryos, and young sockeye salmon will make the switch if exposed to different temperatures. Both factors might be affecting the Columbia river chinooks: Nagler and his colleagues have detected pesticides and other chemicals that could mimic estrogen in the Columbia's water, and the river's temperature regularly changes with the hydroelectricity-related fluctuating water flows.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Intriguingly, such a reversal does not appear to render the fish reproductively impaired. The altered females produced eggs, spawned and then died--the normal Pacific salmon life cycle. But frequent matings between altered females and normal males, both of which carry an X chromosome and a Y chromosome, can yield males with two Y chromosomes. If, as in the case of coho salmon and rainbow trout, these males are sexually viable, they can only produce male offspring. This reduces the number of genetic females in the population with each successive generation, and leads to an imbalance in the sex ratio of spawners. Indeed, the team concludes, "this may be occurring in the present population, where 92 percent of the wild fish sampled carry a DNA marker found on the Y chromosome."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe